本站有中文版。
切换到中文Sourso is your personalized AI CMO for GEO, backed by an agent marketing team that finds opportunities, executes the work, and measures what changed.
Start in one conversation. Nothing to configure.
The CMO is the one you work with. It learns your brand and your judgment, then runs the three teams under it: Source finds where you are missing in AI answers, Solve writes what closes the gap, Operate proves whether it worked.
When the work needs a skill the team lacks, it recommends a specialist from the marketplace and asks for approval before anything runs. Every decision you make is remembered, it understands you better the longer you use it.
Tell Sourso about your brand once. It proactively asks for the context it needs, remembers what matters, and gets sharper as you work together.
No setup project. No dashboard training. No blank page asking you what to do next.
Your AI CMO always recommends the next best step.
We make a lightweight CRM for small teams.
Got it. Who do you lose deals to most often?
HubSpot, usually. We win on setup time.
Kept, and used on every job from here on.
No menu to learn. Say what you want in plain words; the AI CMO decides who does it and comes back with the result.
OperateReads the latest collection and answers with the tier, who shares it, and the next cell to take.SolveSends the same draft back to the Xiaohongshu writer. A new version, never a copy.SourceReads Search Console, adds real search terms, puts a confirmation card in the chat.Your AI CMO is the one you work with every day.
A standing team does the core work. When a specialist is worth bringing in, Sourso recommends one from the marketplace, shows you the cost, and asks for approval before anything runs.
+Nothing on the lower lane runs until you approve it.
Most agent products show you a feed of what ran. What matters more is how the work gets handed over: you brief the team in one conversation, nothing runs until you approve it, and it remembers the calls you made last time.
Brand analystSet up in an afternoon. No admin, no forty-field forms, no consultant.
Coverage analyst
Brand Researcher
Keyword Researcher
Customer ResearcherCompetitive AnalystCommunity ResearcherContent Strategist
Content WriterCopywriter
Copy Editor
SEO SpecialistTechnical SEO Engineer
Web Producer
Social Media ManagerEmail Marketer
PR SpecialistProduct MarketerGrowth MarketerLaunch ManagerBrand ResearcherKeyword ResearcherCustomer ResearcherCompetitive AnalystCommunity ResearcherContent StrategistContent WriterCopywriterCopy EditorSEO SpecialistTechnical SEO EngineerWeb ProducerSocial Media ManagerEmail MarketerPR SpecialistProduct MarketerGrowth MarketerLaunch ManagerBrand AnalystChannel AnalystData AnalystReporting AnalystSite AuditorFact CheckerAnalytics EngineerConversion OptimizerExperiment DesignerCommunity ManagerInfluencer ManagerPartnerships LeadSales Enablement LeadAd DesignerLifecycle MarketerOutreach SpecialistLink Building SpecialistMedia BuyerBrand AnalystChannel AnalystData AnalystReporting AnalystSite AuditorFact CheckerAnalytics EngineerConversion OptimizerExperiment DesignerCommunity ManagerInfluencer ManagerPartnerships LeadSales Enablement LeadAd DesignerLifecycle MarketerOutreach SpecialistLink Building SpecialistMedia BuyerYou brief the CMO in a conversation. A standing team handles the core work; when a specialist is worth bringing in, the CMO recommends one and asks for approval before it runs. You never assign anyone yourself.
AI answer engines, search results, and the places people compare things out loud. Source reads all of them and turns what it finds into four things you can act on: how your brand is doing, who is asking, what they call it, and what your competitors just published.
Whether you get named, at what rank, and how you are described.
Who is asking, and what they are actually trying to decide.
The wording buyers use, worth being the answer to.
Who is named instead of you, and what they published to get there.
For a team under ten people the usual picks are HubSpot, Pipedrive and Zoho. All three cover the basics; the difference is mostly setup time and price at your size.
Most small teams end up on HubSpot’s free tier, or Pipedrive if the work is mainly a sales pipeline. Worth checking how long each takes to set up before you commit.
十人以下的团队,常被推荐的是 HubSpot、Zoho 和纷享销客。功能大同小异,主要差别在配置成本和本地化程度。
Puts your buyers’ questions to the engines every day and records who gets named.
Does the same on Doubao and DeepSeek, including the Doubao app.
Works out your positioning, audience and voice from what you already publish.
Finds the searches and prompts worth being the answer to.
Reads reviews and threads for the words your buyers actually use.
Tracks who is named instead of you, and what they published to get there.
Chinese and international answers are recorded the same way, so you check one report instead of two tools that give different numbers.
It drafts the page, the comparison, or the fix that would get you into that answer. Everything it writes comes from what the engines actually said, not from a guess about what they might say.
Both cover contacts, deals and email. The difference shows up in setup:
HubSpot expects an admin. Loop is configured in an afternoon.
Where HubSpot wins: reporting depth, and the app marketplace.
Writes the landing and guide pages, with sources you can check.
Handles the pages buyers search for: alternatives, comparisons, how-tos.
Decides what to write next, and which of ten research-tested methods to use.
Does the llms.txt and schema work, and hands it over as code you can review.
Builds the pages out on whatever stack your site already runs.
Tightens the drafts, refreshes old posts, keeps one voice.
Agents write the drafts and hand them to you. Nothing gets published unless you say so.
You get visibility, rankings and share of voice tracked over time. Any figure can be opened up to show which engine gave it, on which question, and what it said.
Each point traces back to a recorded answer.
Tracks visibility, ranking, citations and how you get described.
Works out which sources each engine trusts, and why.
Keeps the day-by-day numbers: score, share of voice, movement.
Builds whatever report you ask for, in the conversation.
Runs sixteen checks over the site and lists what to fix first.
Reads drafts before they ship, looking for numbers that do not hold up.
| What needs doing | Hiring it out | With Sourso |
|---|---|---|
| Content marketer | $4,000+/mo | ✓ |
| SEO / GEO agency retainer | $3,000–5,000/mo | ✓ |
| Analyst building the reports | $2,000+/mo | ✓ |
| AI visibility tracking (report-only tools) | $495+/mo | ✓ |
| Chinese engines sampled: Doubao and DeepSeek | not offered | ✓ |
| Every number traceable to a recorded answer | not offered | ✓ |
| Total per month | $10,000+ | Free during beta → |
The middle column is what these roles usually cost when you hire them separately. Sourso is free during the beta; pricing is introduced at public launch.
Ten professions, one situation in common. Buyers ask an AI about your work before they contact anyone, and whoever gets named in that answer gets the call.
Not on the list? See every profession →
The way Source checks engines and Solve rewrites pages is not a house style. It comes from a benchmark the Sourso team published on arXiv, written up here finding by finding.
ChatGPT Citations · Part 1 · arXiv 2610.15382ChatGPT Citations, Part 1: What Happens Between Your Question and the Sources It ShowsRead the write-up →Tell it what you are trying to do, and the team gets on with it.
