本站有中文版。
切换到中文More of your readers now meet the work through an AI answer than through a citation graph. Sourso tracks whether that is happening for you, and writes the pages that make it happen.
Sourso runs the questions people ask in your field, and records which papers, repos and authors get named.
What is the best method for this problem?
Which paper should I read on this?
Is there a library that already does this?
What are the main approaches and how do they differ?
Who works on this?
Take these exact questions, ask ChatGPT or Doubao, and see whose name comes back. If it is not yours, that is the gap. Sign in and Sourso runs the full set for you, on every engine, while you watch.
The conference ends and arXiv buries it. Outside your lab and a handful of readers, the work may as well not exist.
A thread, a blog post, a landing page for the repo. Each costs hours that belong to the next paper.
“What’s the best method for X?” The shortlist skips you, even when the numbers favour your approach.
Source runs the questions people actually ask in your field and records who gets named; Operate turns that into a ranking you read in five minutes instead of a side project you maintain.
Check where you stand. Runs the real questions from your field across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, and records which papers, repos and authors get named.
Rewrite for quotation. Claim first, numbers inline, the difference from related work stated plainly. README, project page and explainer, all drafted for you to review. The optimization methods are ported from published benchmarks (GEO-Bench, C-SEO-Bench), auditable the way you audit a paper.
Watch it move. Recognition, comparative citation and attribution accuracy, tracked per platform, so you can tell whether a change worked.
Behind these steps sit 70+ hireable agents, browse the marketplace →