For Researchers

Get cited by AI when someone asks
for the best method in your field.

More of your readers now meet the work through an AI answer than through a citation graph. Sourso tracks whether that is happening for you, and writes the pages that make it happen.

What They Ask

Sourso runs the questions people ask in your field, and records which papers, repos and authors get named.

What is the best method for this problem?

Which paper should I read on this?

Is there a library that already does this?

What are the main approaches and how do they differ?

Who works on this?

Does AI know you exist?

Take these exact questions, ask ChatGPT or Doubao, and see whose name comes back. If it is not yours, that is the gap. Sign in and Sourso runs the full set for you, on every engine, while you watch.

Where this usually stands
01
The paper lands, then sinks

The conference ends and arXiv buries it. Outside your lab and a handful of readers, the work may as well not exist.

02
Promotion is a second job

A thread, a blog post, a landing page for the repo. Each costs hours that belong to the next paper.

03
Someone asks AI, it names another group

“What’s the best method for X?” The shortlist skips you, even when the numbers favour your approach.

AI answers“What’s the best method for X?”1 · Your method2 · Another group3 · A third groupCitation rank#1Recognition 41%
Why it fits

See your citation footprint without building the pipeline

Source runs the questions people actually ask in your field and records who gets named; Operate turns that into a ranking you read in five minutes instead of a side project you maintain.

  • Name recognition, does the model know your project exists, unprompted?
  • Comparative citation, are you on the shortlist when someone asks for the best method?
  • Attribution accuracy, when cited, does it state your result correctly?
What the agents do

Check where you stand. Runs the real questions from your field across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, and records which papers, repos and authors get named.

Rewrite for quotation. Claim first, numbers inline, the difference from related work stated plainly. README, project page and explainer, all drafted for you to review. The optimization methods are ported from published benchmarks (GEO-Bench, C-SEO-Bench), auditable the way you audit a paper.

Watch it move. Recognition, comparative citation and attribution accuracy, tracked per platform, so you can tell whether a change worked.

Behind these steps sit 70+ hireable agents, browse the marketplace →

Common Questions
No. It writes the pages around the work: a README that states the claim first, a project page, a plain explainer. The paper stays yours.
That is usually the advantage. Where little has been written, a few clear pages can make you the source a model quotes.